Microscopic Study of Oil Flocculation and Coalescence Processes for Understanding the Role of Surfactants in EOR Performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A preliminary microscopic study of oil/oil droplet interactions in surfactant-added water is carried out to understand the oil/water interface changes with time and its effects on oil/oil droplet coalescence. This study is carried out on two oils (olive and crude oil) with varying concentrations of surfactant water ratios. The radii of curvature of the interface between coalescing oil droplets is used as a measure to reflect the change in surface energy. As oil droplets were placed in surfactant-added water, the radii of curvature were measured at three different states. Early state shows very little effect on oil/oil interfaces; in the later state, the effect is greater and interfacial tension decreases rapidly. At quasi-steady state, the state between the early and later, faster rate stage reduces with surfactant concentration in the case of olive oil. Increasing the surfactant concentration does not show the same effect on crude oil. The radii of curvature increase with time by increasing surfactant concentrations in olive oil; an inverse effect is found in crude oil. A natural surfactant prepared from the outer shell of pericarp of soapnut fruit was also used to study droplet formation and coalescence as well as to investigate the impact in interfacial tension and oil mobility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it