MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081204032 · doi:10.1186/1897-4287-10-s3-a3

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Cisplatin in BRCA1 mutation carriers – results of treatment

2012· article· en· W2081204032 on OpenAlexaff
Tomasz Byrski, Jacek Gronwald, Tomasz Huzarski, Elżbieta Marczyk, Paweł Blecharz, Oleg Ashuryk, Cezary Cybulski, Dorota Zuziak, Rafał Wiśniowski, Dariusz Godlewski, SA Narod, Jan Lubiński

Bibliographic record

VenueHereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBRCA gene mutations in cancer
Canadian institutionsWomen's College Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineChemotherapyBreast cancerCisplatinAxillaOncologyStage (stratigraphy)Internal medicineMastectomyCancerSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Material and methods Between December 2006 and August 2011 seventy five women with BRCA1 mutation and diagnosed with breast cancer stage I to III were enrolled. Patients were treated with Cisplatin at dose 75 mg/m2 every three weeks for four cycles. After chemotherapy mastectomy was performed and followed with conventional chemotherapy. Seven patients had prior chemotherapy for a previous cancer diagnosis. Four patients received prior chemotherapy for their current cancer diagnosis and then received therapy according to our protocol. In the group of 67 patients treated with Cisplatin in first line of treatment 32 met the standard criteria for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and in 35 cases the criteria were not met. Pathologic complete response was determined by review of surgical specimens. Complete pathologic response was defined as no residual invasive disease in both the breast and axilla. Information was collected on clinical stage, grade, hormone receptor status and HER2 status prior to treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.573

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.400
Teacher spread0.361 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHereditary Cancer in Clinical PracticeSame topicBRCA gene mutations in cancerFrench-language works237,207