Electrochemical detection of the Fc-STAT3 phosphorylation and STAT3–Fc-STAT3 dimerization and inhibition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) protein is involved in regulatory functions in cell proliferation, differentiation and survival, and is linked to cancer phenotype and tumorigenesis. Towards developing new methodologies for screening STAT3 interactions, the electrochemical method based on the use of redox active protein was proposed. The electrochemical signal, due to the redox (ferrocene)-labeled STAT3 protein immobilized on a gold surface, was modulated due to protein dimerization with the unlabeled STAT3 molecule. The dramatic decrease in current density from 2.7 μA cm(-2) to 0.5 μA cm(-2) was observed following the STAT3-ferrocene-STAT3 dimerization. The electrochemical approach was further extended for screening the potential dimerization inhibitors. Previously published potent salicylic acid derivatives were the most promising candidates for inhibition of STAT3 dimerization in this assay. We expect that other SH2-containing proteins may be monitored by the proposed electrochemical method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".