Further pharmacological evaluation of a novel synthetic peptide bradykinin B2 receptor agonist
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We recently identified a novel human B2 receptor (B2R) agonist [Hyp(3),Thi(5),(N)Chg(7),Thi(8)]-bradykinin (NG291) with greater in vitro and in vivo potency and duration of action than natural bradykinin (BK). Here, we further examined its stability and selectivity toward B2R. The hypotensive, antithrombotic, and profibrinolytic functions of NG291 relative to BK and its analogue ([Hyp(3),Thi(5),(4-Me)Tyr(8)(ΨCH(2)NH)Arg(9)]-BK) (RMP-7) were also tested. Contraction assays using isolated mouse stomachs (containing kinin B1R, B2R, and kininase I- and II-like activities) showed that NG291 is a more potent contractant than BK and is inhibited by HOE-140 (B2R antagonist) but unaffected by R954 (B1R antagonist), whereas both decreased the potency of BK. In stomach tissues from B2R knockout mice, BK maintained its activity via B1R, whereas NG291 had no contractile effect, indicating that it was selective for B2R. Unlike BK, NG291 was not degraded by rabbit lung ACE. Comparing intravenously administered BK and NG291 revealed that NG291 exhibited more potent and prolonged hypotensive action and greater antithrombotic and profibrinolytic activities. These effects were of comparable magnitude to RMP-7 and were absent in B2R knockout mice. We concluded that NG291 is a novel biostable B2R-selective agonist that may prove suitable for investigating the (pre)clinical cardioprotective efficacy of B2R activation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".