MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081281018 · doi:10.1093/jts/flp115

Tobit: The Book of Tobit in Codex Sinaiticus. By ROBERT J. LITTMAN.

2009· article· en· W2081281018 on OpenAlex
Jeremy Corley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Theological Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsDurham College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTobit modelHistoryClassicsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article Tobit: The Book of Tobit in Codex Sinaiticus. By Robert J. Littman. Get access Tobit: The Book of Tobit in Codex Sinaiticus. By Robert J. Littman. Pp. xlvii + 211. (Septuagint Commentary Series.) Leiden: Brill, 2008. isbn 978 90 04 17107 7. €95/$149. Jeremy Corley Jeremy Corley Ushaw College, Durham t.j.j.corley@durham.ac.uk Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Journal of Theological Studies, Volume 61, Issue 1, April 2010, Pages 257–260, https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flp115 Published: 01 November 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it