Suppression of 5′-AMP-activated protein kinase activity does not impair recovery of contractile function during reperfusion of ischemic hearts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Activation of 5'-AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) may benefit the heart during ischemia-reperfusion by increasing energy production. While AMPK stimulates glycolysis, mitochondrial oxidative metabolism is the major source of ATP production during reperfusion of ischemic hearts. Stimulating AMPK increases mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation, but this is usually accompanied by a decrease in glucose oxidation, which can impair the functional recovery of ischemic hearts. To examine the relationship between AMPK and cardiac energy substrate metabolism, we subjected isolated working mouse hearts expressing a dominant negative (DN) alpha(2)-subunit of AMPK (AMPK-alpha(2) DN) to 20 min of global no-flow ischemia and 40 min of reperfusion with Krebs-Henseleit solution containing 5 mM [U-(14)C]glucose, 0.4 mM [9, 10-(3)H]palmitate, and 100 microU/ml insulin. AMPK-alpha(2) DN hearts had reduced AMPK activity at the end of reperfusion (82 +/- 9 vs. 141 +/- 7 pmol.mg(-1).min(-1)) with no changes in high-energy phosphates. Despite this, AMPK-alpha(2) DN hearts had improved recovery of function during reperfusion (14.9 +/- 0.8 vs. 9.4 +/- 1.4 beats.min(-1).mmHg.10(-3)). During reperfusion, fatty acid oxidation provided 44.0 +/- 2.8% of total acetyl-CoA in AMPK-alpha(2) DN hearts compared with 55.0 +/- 3.2% in control hearts. Since insulin can inhibit both AMPK activation and fatty acid oxidation, we also examined functional recovery in the absence of insulin. Functional recovery was similar in both groups despite a decrease in AMPK activity and a decreased reliance on fatty acid oxidation during reperfusion (66.4 +/- 9.4% vs. 85.3 +/- 4.3%). These data demonstrate that the suppression of cardiac AMPK activity does not produce an energetically compromised phenotype and does not impair, but may in fact improve, the recovery of function after ischemia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".