MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081324085 · doi:10.1002/cncr.22691

Primary effusion lymphoma

2007· review· en· W2081324085 on OpenAlexaff
Fadi Brimo, René P. Michel, Karim Khetani, Manon Auger

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral-associated cancers and disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPathologyPrimary effusion lymphomaImmunocytochemistryLymphomaMedicineImmunophenotypingLarge cellCytopathologyNull cellAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaCytologyCancerBiologyAdenocarcinomaImmunologyAntigenCell cultureInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8)-associated and very rare type of lymphoma usually confined to the body cavities and commonly observed in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients. A comparison was made between the cytologic and immunocytochemical features of 4 cases of PEL encountered in the authors' department with those reported to date in the literature. METHODS: A comprehensive comparison of the cytologic and immunocytochemical features of the 4 cases with those reported in the literature was conducted. RESULTS: Cytologically, the most consistent features of the 4 cases and those in the literature included large cell size, moderate to abundant cytoplasm, a single nucleus in most cells with occasional bi- or multinucleated giant cells, single to multiple prominent nucleoli, and coarse chromatin. Immunocytochemically, only 2 (50%) of the current cases were of the null-phenotype compared with 93% of cases in the literature; the other 2 cases had a T-cell phenotype. Activation markers were expressed in 50% and 78% of the current cases and the literature cases, respectively. Positivity for HHV-8 was proven in the 4 cases by immunocytochemistry. CONCLUSIONS: Cytomorphologically, PEL exhibits features bridging large cell immunoblastic and anaplastic large cell lymphoma. Although it is usually of null-phenotype, it may occasionally express B-cell or T-cell markers, rendering its distinction difficult from other lymphomatous effusions on a cytologic and immunocytochemical basis alone. Therefore, HHV-8 detection is an essential confirmatory ancillary test in suspected cases of PEL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancerSame topicViral-associated cancers and disordersFrench-language works237,207