MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081376942 · doi:10.1080/00365540410020974

A nosocomial sapovirus-associated outbreak of gastroenteritis in adults

2004· article· en· W2081376942 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Johansson, Katarina Bergentoft, Per Anders Larsson, Gunilla Magnusson, Anders Widell, Margareta Thorhagen, Kjell‐Olof Hedlund

Bibliographic record

VenueScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSapovirusNorovirusOutbreakMedicineVomitingPediatricsAcute gastroenteritisDiarrheaInternal medicineVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Greenland is a high-income country with free access to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care, including highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). We aimed to examine the HIV prevalence, age and gender distribution, and the effectiveness of HAART on CD4 positive cell count, viral load (VL), and mortality in the Greenland HIV-infected population. In this population-based cohort study we collected demographic, clinical and biochemical data on all HIV-infected patients followed in health clinics since 1995. For each case, we identified 100 age- and gender-matched population controls. The HIV cohort included 103 patients of whom 91% were Inuit; 81% were infected heterosexually. Only 40% of the patients had a VL <400 copies/ml at 48 weeks after starting HAART, and patients on HAART had a substantial excess relative mortality compared with the general population (mortality rate ratio [MRR]: 10.6; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.9-16.4). After the introduction of HAART, the mortality decreased (MRR: 2.5; 95% CI 0.9-6.8), but remained high with a mortality rate of 62 per 1000 person-years (py) (95% CI 29-129). Our findings underline the difficulties of implementing successful HIV treatment even with unlimited economic resources and free access to health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations78
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScandinavian Journal of Infectious DiseasesSame topicViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyFrench-language works237,207