Controlling modulus and morphology of hydrogel tubes through surface modification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crosslinked, porous poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-methyl methacrylate) (PHEMA-MMA) tubes were prepared in cylindrical glass molds using a new centrifugal casting process developed in our group. The resulting hydrogel tubes have a bi-phasic wall structure, with a spongy inner layer and a gel-like outer layer, the latter of which provides mechanical strength to the tube. While many factors influence wall morphology and, thus, mechanical properties, we focused on the effect of the surface properties of the glass mold in which tubes are synthesized. Specifically, we investigated the impact of a diverse set of silane modifications of the glass mold on tube morphology, elastic modulus and mold release. We treated activated glass surfaces with one of three alkoxysilanes having either ethoxy, amine or fluorocarbon end-groups. Silane-modified glass surfaces were found to be more hydrophobic than the unmodified glass mold, with the most hydrophobic surface being that of the fluorocarbon-terminated silane. The presence of the silane layer on the mold was confirmed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and the stability of this modification was confirmed by examining the surface chemistry of the hydrogel tubes. The biphasic hydrogel tube wall structure was observed for all tubes, yet those tubes synthesized in unmodified molds had a cracked outer morphology, whereas those synthesized in silane-modified molds had a smooth outer morphology. This influenced the mechanical properties of the tubes where tubes synthesized in silane-modified molds had a significantly greater elastic modulus than those tubes synthesized in unmodified molds. Release from the molds was easiest with ethoxy- and amine-functionalized silane mold modifications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it