Decreased Cartilage Thickness in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis Assessed by Ultrasonography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) may result in disability, which is caused primarily by degeneration of the osteocartilaginous structures, due to the synovial inflammatory process. It is essential to closely monitor structural damage during the disease course. We aimed to compare ultrasound (US) measurements of joint cartilage thickness in 5 joints in children with JIA to our findings in an age- and sex-related healthy cohort regarding disease duration, joint activity, JIA subtype, age, and sex. METHODS: We clinically examined joint activity in 95 patients with JIA and collected parent and physician global assessments. Joint cartilage thickness was assessed by greyscale US in knee, ankle, wrist, metacarpophalangeal, and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joints. Measurements were compared to reference values of a healthy cohort from a previous study. Medical records were reviewed for JIA subtype, treatment, and disease duration. RESULTS: Joint cartilage thickness was decreased in the knee, wrist, and second PIP joint in children with JIA compared with the healthy cohort (p < 0.001 for all). Patients with oligoarticular JIA had thicker cartilage than patients with polyarticular and systemic JIA. We also found decreased joint cartilage thickness in joints not previously affected by arthritis in children with JIA compared to the same joint in the healthy cohort. We found decreasing cartilage thickness with age and thicker cartilage in boys than in girls. CONCLUSION: Children with JIA have reduced cartilage thickness compared with children who do not have JIA, and children with polyarticular and systemic JIA have thinner cartilage than children with oligoarticular JIA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".