MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081464975 · doi:10.1117/12.697638

Characterization of time-domain fluorescence properties of typical photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy

2007· article· en· W2081464975 on OpenAlexafffund
Jennifer Russell, Kevin R. Diamond, Tony Collins, Mark A. Weston, Jonathan F. Lovell, Joseph E. Hayward, Tom Farrell, Michael S. Patterson, Qiyin Fang

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhotodynamic Therapy Research Studies
Canadian institutionsJuravinski Cancer CentreMcMaster University
FundersMcMaster University
KeywordsPhotodynamic therapyPhotosensitizerFluorescenceProtoporphyrin IXIn vivoFluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopyTwo-photon excitation microscopyFluorescence spectroscopyChemistryFluorescence microscopeBiophysicsPicosecondMicroscopyConfocalPhotochemistryMaterials scienceLaserOpticsPathologyMedicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report the investigation of fluorescence lifetime of delta-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) induced protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) and Photofrin© <i>in vitro</i> in MAT-LyLu (MLL) rat prostate adenocarcinoma cells. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been extensively investigated in the past decade as an effective treatment option for various types of invasive tumors. The efficacy of PDT treatment depends strongly on cell uptake and subsequent excitation of the photosensitizers. Characterization of fluorescence lifetime of these drugs provides the basis for further investigation of <i>in vivo </i>PDT dosage measurements using time-domain spectroscopy and imaging. Physiologically relevant concentrations of the photosensitizer solutions were prepared. A picosecond diode laser was used to excite the two drugs and the time-resolved fluorescence decay was recorded using a time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) system. MLL cells were incubated with the photosensitizers and were treated with light under well-oxygenated or hypoxic conditions. Fluorescence lifetime images of these cells were recorded by a confocal FLIM microscope. The measured fluorescence lifetimes of both photosensitizers are much longer than typical endogenous tissue fluorescence, which suggests time-domain methods are good candidates for <i>in vivo </i>PDT monitoring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.881

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotodynamic Therapy Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207