The Bipyridyl Herbicide Paraquat Produces Oxidative Stress-Mediated Toxicity in Human Neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y Cells: Relevance to the Dopaminergic Pathogenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Paraquat (PQ) is a cationic nonselective bipyridyl herbicide widely used to control weeds and grasses in agriculture. Epidemiologic studies indicate that exposure to pesticides can be a risk factor in the incidence of Parkinson's disease (PD). A strong correlation has been reported between exposure to paraquat and PD incidence in Canada, Taiwan, and the United States. This correlation is supported by animal studies showing that paraquat produces toxicity in dopaminergic neurons of the rat and mouse brain. However, it is unclear how paraquat triggers toxicity in dopaminergic neurons. Based on the prooxidant properties of paraquat, it was hypothesized that paraquat may induce oxidative stress-mediated toxicity in dopaminergic neurons. To explore this possibility, dopaminergic SH-SY5Y cells were treated with paraquat, and several biomarkers of oxidativestress were measured. First, a specific dopamine transporter inhibitor GBR12909 significantly protected SY5Y cells against the toxicity of paraquat, indicating that paraquat exerts its toxicity by a mechanism involving the dopamine transporter (DAT). Second, paraquat increased intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), but decreased the levels of glutathione. Third, paraquat inhibited glutathione peroxidase activity, but did not affect glutathione reductase activity. On the other hand, paraquat increased GST activity by 24 h, after which GST activity returned to the control value at 48 h. Fourth, paraquat dissipated mitochondrial transmembrane potential (MTP). Fifth, paraquat produced increases of malondialdehyde (MDA) and protein carbonyls, as well as DNA fragmentation, indicating oxidative damage to major cellular components. Sixth, paraquat increased the protein level of heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). Taken together, these findings verify our hypothesis that paraquat produces oxidative stress-mediated toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells. Thus, current findings suggest that paraquat may induce the pathogenesis of dopaminergic neurons through oxidative stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".