MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081502053 · doi:10.1002/hyp.5764

Evaluating runoff generation during summer using hydrometric, stable isotope and hydrochemical methods in a discontinuous permafrost alpine catchment

2005· article· en· W2081502053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrological Processes · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences
KeywordsBaseflowSurface runoffPermafrostHydrographHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceStreamflowSoil waterSurface waterDrainage basinGeologySubsurface flowGroundwaterSoil scienceOceanographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Research on runoff generation in catchments with discontinuous permafrost has focused primarily upon the role of surface organic layers and frozen soils (both permanent and seasonal). Much of this work has been hydrometric, with isotope and hydrochemical methods receiving only limited application in delineating old and new water contributions and chemically inferred hydrological pathways. In a small subarctic alpine catchment within the Wolf Creek Research Basin, Yukon, runoff generation processes were studied in the summer of 2001 using a mixed method approach to evaluate the mechanisms and pathways of flow from the hillslopes to the stream during rainfall events. Two storms had δ 18 O isotopic ratios that differed significantly from baseflow and water within hillslopes, allowing for two‐component hydrograph separation to infer new and old water contributions. Event water contributions ranged between 7 and 9%, exhibiting little variability despite the large differences in event water and stormflow volume. Utilizing δ 18 O‐dissolved organic carbon and δ 18 O‐specific conductance data, two tracer three‐component hydrograph separations were attempted to isolate rainfall, water within the organic layer and mineral layer contributions to stormflow. Three‐component separations suggest that water from the mineral soil dominates the stormflow hydrograph, yet the contribution of organic‐layer water varies greatly depending upon the choice of tracers. Hydrometric data indicate that slopes with permafrost likely supply much of the stormflow water due to near‐surface water tables and transmissive organic soils. However, this signal was not clearly discernable in the streamflow hydrochemistry. More integrated studies are required to establish a greater understanding of hillslope processes in mountainous discontinuous permafrost catchments. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.771
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.155
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it