MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081521210 · doi:10.1115/imece2005-80597

Evaluation of Tool Wear Suppressive Ability of Lubricants Usein in Minimum Quantity Lubrication Application in High Speed Machining of Cast Aluminum Alloys

2005· article· en· W2081521210 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander Bardetsky, Helmi Attia, M.A. Elbestawi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMetalworkingLubricantLubricationMachiningTribologyMaterials scienceTool wearMetallurgyAlloyLubricityCutting toolAluminiumMechanical engineeringComposite materialEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The disadvantages of conventional metalworking fluids such as disposal problems, health problems and economic factors have led to the development of strategies to reduce their amount in metalworking. Recently, Minimum Quantity Lubrication (MQL) technology was developed and it seems to be a suitable alternative for economically and environmentally compatible production. It combines the functionality of lubrication with an extremely low consumption of lubricant and has a potential to replace metalworking fluids application in machining operations. The MQL lubricants are formulated with two major groups of additives; anti-wear (AW) additives and extreme pressure (EP) additives. When such lubricants are applied to the cutting zone, protective layers are formed on the interacting surfaces of the workpiece and the cutting tool. These layers prevent direct contact between the tool and chip surfaces, and, therefore reduce friction forces and tool wear. In order to utilize MQL to its full potential, it is essential to select appropriate lubricant composition for particular work material and machining parameters. The experimental study of different compositions of MQL lubricants is reported. The effectiveness of the lubricants are determined in terms of their ability to protect the cutting tool in high speed machining of cast aluminum alloys, which are widely used in automotive industry. The main objective of this research is to quantitatively evaluate the ability of lubricant’s additive composition to reduce the tool wear. This is reached through the comparison between the tool wear rate measured during the machining of aluminum cast alloy with the application of MQL, and the tool wear rate obtained in dry machining of the same alloy. Two kinds of the lubricants are evaluated; vegetable and synthetic. The content of AW and EP additives in each kind of lubricant was varied on three levels in order to capture the effect of the lubricant’s composition on tool wear. The result of the MQL lubricants evaluation is discussed and the recommendations for optimal lubricant composition are made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced machining processes and optimizationFrench-language works237,207