MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081533071 · doi:10.1029/2010jb007796

Constraints on the deep thermal structure of the Dharwar craton, India, from heat flow, shear wave velocities, and mantle xenoliths

2011· article· en· W2081533071 on OpenAlexafffund
Sukanta Roy, Jean‐Claude Mareschal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersUniversité du Québec à Montréal
KeywordsGeologyMantle (geology)Dharwar CratonGeophysicsEarth's internal heat budgetLithosphereCratonHeat fluxDownwellingMantle wedgeTransition zoneMantle convectionPetrologySeismologyHeat transferTectonicsMechanicsPhysicsUpwelling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[1] We have used constraints from seismic shear wave vertical velocity profiles, geothermobarometry estimates on mantle xenoliths, and surface heat flux and heat production measurements to analyze the thermal regime of the deep lithosphere beneath India. In the Dharwar craton of southern India, the shear wave velocity gradient in the mantle, as well as xenolith geothermobarometry data, suggests a low mantle heat flux, 14–20 mW m−2, consistent with surface heat flux measurements. However, for standard cratonic mantle composition, seismic velocities require Moho and mantle temperatures to be about 300 K higher than inferred from heat flux and xenolith data. This discrepancy can be only resolved by changing the mantle composition, specifically by increasing the Fe number. The shear wave velocities are highest beneath north central India, where calculated S wave travel times are 2 s shorter than in the Dharwar craton. These differences in traveltime and the very steep gradient in the shear wave velocity profiles in north central India cannot be explained by variations in mantle temperature but require differences in mantle composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations59
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207