PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY OF A PELVIC KIDNEY: A POSTERIOR APPROACH THROUGH THE GREATER SCIATIC FORAMEN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No AccessJournal of UrologyCLINICAL UROLOGY: Case Reports1 Jul 2001PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY OF A PELVIC KIDNEY: A POSTERIOR APPROACH THROUGH THE GREATER SCIATIC FORAMEN JAMES D. WATTERSON, ANTHONY COOK, RIKI SAHAJPAL, JOHN BENNETT, and JOHN D. DENSTEDT JAMES D. WATTERSONJAMES D. WATTERSON More articles by this author , ANTHONY COOKANTHONY COOK More articles by this author , RIKI SAHAJPALRIKI SAHAJPAL More articles by this author , JOHN BENNETTJOHN BENNETT More articles by this author , and JOHN D. DENSTEDTJOHN D. DENSTEDT Financial interest and/or other relationship with Boston Scientific, Cook Canada and Phillips Petroleum. More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66114-9AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail "PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY OF A PELVIC KIDNEY: A POSTERIOR APPROACH THROUGH THE GREATER SCIATIC FORAMEN." The Journal of Urology, 166(1), pp. 209–210 References 1 : Laparoscopic surgery for urolithiasis: pyelolithotomy, calyceal diverticulectomy and treatment of stones in a pelvic kidney. J Endourol2000; 14: 829. Google Scholar 2 : Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a pelvic kidney: a case report and review of the literature. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg1997; 1: 163. Google Scholar 3 : Drainage of pelvic abscesses through the greater sciatic foramen. Radiology1986; 158: 487. Google Scholar From the Departments of Urology and Radiology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada© 2001 by American Urological Association, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 166Issue 1July 2001Page: 209-210 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2001 by American Urological Association, Inc.Keywordsnephrostomy, percutaneousurinary calculikidneyMetricsAuthor Information JAMES D. WATTERSON More articles by this author ANTHONY COOK More articles by this author RIKI SAHAJPAL More articles by this author JOHN BENNETT More articles by this author JOHN D. DENSTEDT Financial interest and/or other relationship with Boston Scientific, Cook Canada and Phillips Petroleum. More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".