MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081564267 · doi:10.1097/mrr.0b013e3283298192

Development of a Computerized Visual Search Test

2009· article· en· W2081564267 on OpenAlexaff
Denise Reid, Harsha Babani, Eugenia Jon

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Rehabilitation Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicErgonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTest (biology)Task (project management)Visual searchPerceptionComputer sciencePsychologyCognitive psychologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visual attention and visual search are the features of visual perception, essential for attending and scanning one's environment while engaging in daily occupations. This study describes the development of a novel web-based test of visual search. The development information including the format of the test will be described. The test was designed to provide an alternative to existing cancellation tests. Data from two pilot studies will be reported that examined some aspects of the test's validity. To date, our assessment of the test shows that it discriminates between healthy and head-injured persons. More research and development work is required to examine task performance changes in relation to task complexity. It is suggested that the conceptual design for the test is worthy of further investigation. Die visuelle Aufmerksamkeit und Suche sind Features der visuellen Wahrnehmung, die für die Beachtung und das Scannen des eigenen Umfelds bei der Alltagsbewältigung unerlässlich sind. Die vorliegende Studie beschreibt die Entwicklung eines neuartigen web-basierten visuellen Suchtests. Beschrieben werden die Entwicklungsinformationen und der Testaufbau. Der Test ist als Alternative zu den bestehenden Cancellation-Tests gedacht. Daten aus zwei Pilotstudien, die einige Aspekte der Gültigkeit des Tests untersuchten, werden angezeigt. Unsere bisherige Beurteilung des Tests zeigt, dass er zwischen gesunden Personen und Personen mit Kopfverletzungen diskriminiert. Daran müssen sich weitere Forschungs- und Entwicklungsarbeiten anschließen, um die Änderungen der Performance des Tasks hinsichtlich der Komplexität des Tasks untersuchen zu können. Es wird auf die Möglichkeit hingewiesen, dass die Test-Konzeption verdient, weiter untersucht zu werden. L'attention et la recherche visuelles sont des caractéristiques de la perception visuelle, indispensables à l'observation et à l'interaction avec notre environnement lors des activités de la vie quotidienne. Cette étude décrit le développement d'un nouveau test de la recherche visuelle disponible sur Internet. Elle présente des informations sur son développement, ainsi que son format. Le test a été conçu pour offrir une alternative aux tests d'annulation existants. Les données de deux études pilotes examinant certains aspects de la validité du test sont présentées. À ce jour, notre évaluation du test indique qu'il distingue les personnes saines et les individus souffrant de traumatismes crâniens. Des travaux de recherche et de développement complémentaires sont nécessaires pour examiner les changements au niveau de l'exécution des tâches en relation avec leur complexité. Il est suggéré que la conception du test mérite un examen plus approfondi. La atención visual y la búsqueda visual son componentes de la percepción visual, y son esenciales para poder prestar atención y efectuar búsquedas de estímulos visuales en nuestro entorno durante la realización de actividades de la vida diaria. Este estudio describe la creación de una prueba de búsqueda visual en línea. Se describe el proceso de creación de esta prueba y su formato. La prueba se concibió como una alternativa a las pruebas de cancelación existentes. Se presentan los datos obtenidos en dos estudios preliminares en los que se examinaron varios aspectos relativos a la validez de esta prueba. Hasta hoy, nuestra valoración de la prueba muestra variaciones de los resultados en personas sanas y en personas con traumatismos craneoencefálicos. Se necesitan más investigaciones y ajustes de la prueba para poder evaluar los cambios relativos a la realización de la prueba según la complejidad de la tarea asignada en ella. Se recomienda una investigación más minuciosa del diseño conceptual de la prueba.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.470
Teacher spread0.423 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Rehabilitation ResearchSame topicErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersFrench-language works237,207