INSIGHTS INTO THE PATHOGENESIS AND AETIOLOGY OF CONGENITAL DIAPHRAGMATIC HERNIA FROM RODENT MODELS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a major life-threatening cause of respiratory failure in the newborn. Regions of the diaphragm failing to form during embryogenesis characterize the developmental anomaly. Normally, the diaphragm develops to form a continuous sheet that completely separates the thoracic and abdominal cavities prior to the major period of internal organ growth. However, in the instance of CDH, a significant proportion of the diaphragmatic musculature (typically the left dorsolateral region) is absent. Consequently, the developing viscera can invade the thoracic cavity, occupying space normally reserved for the growing lungs. As a result, newborns with CDH (∼1:2500 births) suffer from a combination of pulmonary hypoplasia, pulmonary hypertension and surfactant deficiency. Treatment strategies include nitric oxide administration, high frequency oscillatory ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, exogenous surfactant administration and surgical repair of the diaphragm. Despite these advances in neonatal intensive care, mortality and morbidity remains high.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".