MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081609506 · doi:10.1007/s11746-002-0469-7

One‐step methodology for the synthesis of FA picolinyl esters from intact lipids

2002· article· en· W2081609506 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Destaillats, Paul Angers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBiopolymer Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryDerivatizationHydrolysisAnhydrousChromatographyTransesterificationChlorideOrganic chemistryCatalysisHigh-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Picolinyl derivatives are used for structural determination of FA by GC‐MS. Although they provide reliable diagnostic fragments, the usual multistep methodologies applied for their preparation require TAG hydrolysis or acid chloride formation prior to picolinyl synthesis. These reaction conditions may result in the presence of artifact molecules in the samples and thus compromise analytical quality and accuracy. To address these problems, a rapid, simple and quantitative methodology for the synthesis of FA picolinyl esters from intact lipids was developed. It involves their transesterification under basecatalyzed conditions using 3‐potassiooxamethylpyridine in methylene chloride. The catalyst was prepared by proton exchange between potassium tert‐butoxide and anhydrous 3‐hydroxymethylpyridine. Mild reaction conditions allowed complete derivatization of TAG and phospholipids in 2 min at room temperature, and of FAME in 15 min at 45°C. The proposed procedure, which can be used on a routine basis, was applied to Ipomoae imperialis seed lipids and used to confirm occurrence of γ‐linoleic acid at a level of 0.9%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations110
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicBiopolymer Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207