MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Validation of TaqMan® SNP genotyping specificity for rs12979860 of IL-28B: Modeling primer specificity in vitro

2014· article· en· W2081615013 on OpenAlexafffund
Bradley Thomas, Michael Joyce, Aviad Levin, D. Lorne Tyrrell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Virological Methods · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytokine Signaling Pathways and Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsBiologyGenotypingSNP genotypingTaqMangenomic DNAIn silicoMolecular biologyPrimer (cosmetics)Molecular Inversion ProbeGeneGeneticsSNPGenotypeOligonucleotideComputational biologyPolymerase chain reactionSingle-nucleotide polymorphismChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Members of the type III interferon gene family arose by gene duplication events and have retained a high percent identity both in their coding and non-coding regions. In this study, the specificity of a widely used TaqMan(®) SNP genotyping assay for rs12979860 is validated. The 66 bp template for SNP genotyping has only 3 bp at one 5' end that vary between IL-28B and IL-28A; excluding the rs12979860 SNP itself. Conflicting annealing temperatures were found for the mismatched 19 bp primer to IL-28B and IL-28A with in silico melting temperature algorithms, or with in vitro dissociation curves. In order to prove specificity for IL-28B, an in vitro competition assay was setup with genomic DNA and synthetic oligonucleotides. When genomic DNA, containing equimolar concentrations of rs12979860 and the homologous region of IL-28A are present, no off-target amplification was observed. This SNP genotyping assay is therefore specific for rs12979860 and all previously reported results are valid. Finally, using a completely synthetic in vitro competition assay it was possible to calculate the amount of off-target template that will produce 1/2 the maximum on-target (VIC) fluorescent signal, a value that is between a C/C genotype and a T/T genotype. This value is defined in the manuscript as the half maximum positive value, KHPV, and in the present assay KHPV is 15.75±0.0721, represented as the relative fold increase in the amount of IL-28A over rs12979860. This method will be of interest to those performing genotyping on highly conserved gene families.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.432

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Virological MethodsSame topicCytokine Signaling Pathways and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207