MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081627952 · doi:10.1097/bot.0000000000000071

BMP-2 mRNA Expression After Endothelial Progenitor Cell Therapy for Fracture Healing

2014· article· en· W2081627952 on OpenAlexafffund
Ru Li, Aaron Nauth, Rajiv Gandhi, Khalid Syed, Emil H. Schemitsch

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Orthopaedic Trauma · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineBone healingProgenitor cellNonunionBone morphogenetic protein 2AngiogenesisEndothelial progenitor cellBone marrowBone morphogenetic proteinStem cellEx vivoPopulationAndrologyIn vivoPathologySurgeryInternal medicineCell biologyIn vitroBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) represent a population of novel precursor cells with known ability to participate in angiogenesis. Our previous studies have shown that local EPC therapy significantly increased angiogenesis and osteogenesis to promote fracture healing in an animal bone defect model. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which EPC therapy promotes fracture healing remain largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to quantify local bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-2) expression after EPC therapy for a rat segmental bone defect, in hopes of further defining the potential mechanisms by which EPCs promote fracture healing. METHOD: EPCs were isolated from the bone marrow of syngeneic rats and cultured ex vivo for 7-10 days before transfer to the bone defect. A total of 56 rats were studied. The treatment group received 1 × 10 EPCs on a gelfoam scaffold at the bone defect, and control animals received gelfoam/saline only. Before euthanasia, radiographs of the femur were performed. Animals were euthanized at 1, 2, 3, and 10 weeks, and specimens from the fracture gap area were collected, pulverized, and total messenger RNA (mRNA) was extracted. BMP-2 mRNA was measured by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and quantified by VisionWorksLS. All measurements were performed in triplicate. RESULTS: All EPC-treated bone defects healed radiographically by 10 weeks, whereas control-treated defects developed a nonunion. The expression of BMP-2 mRNA was significantly elevated in EPC-treated defects relative to controls at week 1 (EPC, 0.59 ± 0.10; control, 0.31 ± 0.08; P = 0.05), week 2 (EPC, 0.40 ± 0.06; control, 0.23 ± 0.04; P = 0.04), and week 3 (EPC, 0.33 ± 0.06; control, 0.18 ± 0.03; P = 0.04), but not at week 10 (EPC, 0.31 ± 0.06; control, 0.21 ± 0.04, P = 0.15). The highest mean expression of BMP-2 in EPC-treated defects was observed at 1 week, with a progressive decline in BMP-2 expression noted thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that EPC-treated bone defects demonstrate both radiographic healing and elevated expression of BMP-2 relative to control-treated defects. These results provide further insight into the potential mechanisms by which EPC therapy may promote fracture healing and provide further evidence to suggest that the trophic actions of EPC therapy may be a critical factor in their contribution to fracture healing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Orthopaedic TraumaSame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207