Systematic relationships in<i>Lathyrus</i>sect.<i>Lathyrus</i>(Fabaceae) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) were utilized to examine systematic relationships in Lathyrus L. sect. Lathyrus (Fabaceae). In addition to a parsimony-based phylogenetic tree, AFLP-based trees were constructed using Dice, Jaccard, and mean character difference coefficients to produce distance-based trees using the UPGMA and neighbor-joining methods. All trees clearly show a close relationship among accessions of the same species, confirming the monophyly of the species examined. All analyses indicate that species of the section Lathyrus are distinct from species of other sections. These findings confirm the monophyly of the section and contradict proposals to split it. They do not support the segregation of L. gorgoni in the section Gorgonia. Within the section Lathyrus, several relationships are present but are only weakly supported. The use of AFLP data to resolve systematic relationships in the genus Lathyrus is further demonstrated.Key words: Lathyrus, Fabaceae, systematics, AFLP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".