C-Terminal Cyclization of an SDF-1 Small Peptide Analogue Dramatically Increases Receptor Affinity and Activation of the CXCR4 Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In an effort to improve the activities and bioavailabilities of stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1, CXCL12) sdf-(1-67)-OH (1), we have prepared a linear peptide analogue [sdf-(1-31)-NH(2) (2)] and two lactam analogues [cyclo(Lys(20)-Glu(24))-sdf-(1-31)-NH(2) (3) and cyclo(Glu(24)-Lys(28))-sdf-(1-31)-NH(2) (4)], consisting of the N-terminal region (amino acids 1-14) joined by a four-glycine linker to the C-terminal region (amino acids 56-67) of 1. Analogues 2 and 4 had eight residues of alpha-helix, as estimated from its circular dichroism (CD) spectra, in contrast to 10 residues in analogue 3. Cyclization of analogue 2 at residues 20 and 24 to give analogue 3 resulted in only a slight change to the theta;(222)/theta;(209) ratio (0.81 to 0.86, where 1.09 is considered a perfect alpha-helix), although an increase in the alpha-helix length of analogue 3 was observed. In contrast, cyclization between residues 24 and 28 by lactamization to give analogue 4 only slightly affected the helical content but clearly resulted in a more classical alpha-helical structure (theta;(222)/theta;(209) = 0.98). Cyclization of the linear analogue 2 enhanced the SDF-1 receptor CXCR4 binding approximately 114-fold, where the IC(50) values derived from (125)I-SDF-1 competitive binding assays with CEM cells were found to be 39.5 +/- 5.9 nM, 28.9 +/- 6.3 microM, 225.8 +/- 11.8 nM, and 254.1 +/- 5.4 nM for analogues 1-4, respectively. Intracellular calcium mobilization ([Ca(2+)](i)) induced after interaction with CXCR4, as measured by EC(50), was significantly reduced in analogue 4 compared to 3, and approached the EC(50) of native SDF-1, indicating a correlation between the degree of alpha-helix and biological activity. Therefore, the biological activity of small peptide SDF-1 analogues is highly dependent on the conformation of its C-terminal region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".