Suppression of the Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1 Response in Cervical Carcinoma Xenografts by Proteasome Inhibitors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Experimental data suggest therapeutic advantage from selective disruption of the hypoxia response. We recently found that the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib decreases tumor carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) expression in colon cancer patients and herein report a companion laboratory study to test if this effect was the result of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) inhibition. Human cervical (SiHa and Me180) and colon (RKO) carcinoma cell lines were treated with bortezomib or the structurally unrelated proteasome inhibitor MG132 in normoxic and hypoxic conditions in vitro. Two different in vivo experiments investigated bortezomib effects after single dose (2 mg/kg, 24 h) or longer exposure in severe combined immunodeficient mice bearing SiHa xenografts. Treatment with either drug produced accumulation of HIF-1alpha in vitro but strongly inhibited the production of CAIX and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) under hypoxia. This correlated with more than 10-fold reduction in HIF-1 transcriptional activity under hypoxic conditions. A similar effect of bortezomib was seen in vivo, using the nitroimidazole probe EF5 to define regions of tumor hypoxia and a triple immunofluorescence technique to measure the spatial distributions of HIF-1alpha and CAIX. Plasma VEGF levels decreased by approximately 90% during treatment with bortezomib, indicating that this agent can potently inhibit the hypoxia response in tumors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".