MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A tribute to D.B. Spalding and his contributions in science and engineering

2009· article· en· W2081763904 on OpenAlexaff
В. И. Артемов, Steven Beale, G. de Vahl Davis, M. P. Escudier, Norberto Fueyo, B. E. Launder, E. Leonardi, M.R. Malin, W.J. Minkowycz, Suhas V. Patankar, A. Pollard, W. Rodi, Akshai K. Runchal, S. P. Vanka

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and flame dynamics
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributeCombustionWork (physics)TurbulenceComputational fluid dynamicsFluid dynamicsScience and engineeringComputer scienceHeat transferSimple (philosophy)Thermal scienceFlow (mathematics)Industrial engineeringStatistical physicsApplied mathematicsMechanicsThermodynamicsPhysicsMathematicsEngineering ethicsChemistryPhilosophyEngineeringEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a summary of some of the scientific and engineering contributions of Prof. D.B. Spalding up to the present time. Starting from early work on combustion, and his unique work in mass transfer theory, Spalding’s unpublished “unified theory” is described briefly. Subsequent to this, developments in algorithms by the Imperial College group led to the birth of modern computational fluid dynamics , including the well-known SIMPLE algorithm. Developments in combustion, multi-phase flow and turbulence modelling are also described. Finally, a number of academic and industrial applications of computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer applications considered in subsequent years are mentioned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0030.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Heat and Mass TransferSame topicCombustion and flame dynamicsFrench-language works237,207