Immunophenotypic Analysis of HL-60 Cells during Basophilic Differentiation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differentiation along specific myeloid lineages may be accompanied by characteristic cell surface marker changes. We have examined leukemic HL-60 cell changes under conditions which induce basophilic differentiation. An increased surface expression of CD35, CD11b, and decreased expression of CD15 was found by flow cytometry during the 5-day induction period. Further investigation revealed two cell populations after 5 days in vitro: (i) a CD35-positive population (61% of cells present) containing a significant number of CD15-negative cells, and (ii) a CD15-positive/CD35-negative population. The CD35-positive subset appears to account for the majority of the basophilic cells induced under these conditions, as measured by histamine content and metachromatic staining. In addition, this subset contains a small number of early monocytic cells (CD14 and CD23 positive). The expression of CD11b is variably found on the CD15-positive/ CD35-negative subset of induced cells. These results suggest that CD35 and CD15 surface immunophenotyping can be used to map steps involved in myeloid development. A role for CD35 and CD15 in early basophil differentiation is proposed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".