MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081819510 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2012.2223247

Configurable Input–Output Power Pad for Wafer-Scale Microelectronic Systems

2012· article· en· W2081819510 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicolas Laflamme-Mayer, Walder André, Olivier Valorge, Yves Blaquière, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersCanada Research ChairsPolytechnique MontréalCMC Microsystems
KeywordsCMOSWaferElectrical engineeringTransistorMicroelectronicsComputer scienceElectronic engineeringVoltageEngineeringTopology (electrical circuits)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe, in this paper, a new digital input-output power configurable PAD (CPAD) for a wafer-scale-based rapid prototyping platform for electronic systems. This wafer-scale platform includes a reconfigurable wafer-scale circuit that can interconnect any digital components manually deposited on its active alignment-insensitive surface. The whole platform is powered using a massive grid of embedded voltage regulators. Power is fed from the bottom side of the wafer using through silicon vias. The CPAD can be configured to provide CMOS standard voltages of 1.0, 1.5, 1.8, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.3 V using a single 3.3 V power supply. The digital I/O includes transistors sharing and is embedded within the regulation circuit by combining it with a turbo mode that insures high-speed operation. Fast load regulation is achieved with a 5.5-ns response time to a current step load for a maximum current of 110 mA per CPAD. The proposed circuit architecture benefits from a hierarchical arborescence topology where one master stage drives 16 CPADs with a very small quiescent current of 366 nA. The CPAD circuit and the master stage occupy a small area of 0.00847 and 0.00726 mm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> , respectively, in CMOS 0.18-μm technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) SystemsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207