Conditions for imaging emulsions in the environmental scanning electron microscope
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) is a technique capable of imaging volatile and/or insulating samples in their natural state, without prior specimen preparation. It is thus a powerful potential tool for the study of the structure and dynamics of emulsions and other complex liquid systems, at a resolution greater than that obtainable by conventional optical microscopy. We present images of a variety of liquid systems containing micron-scale and smaller features. The morphology of these systems may be clearly discerned. The contrast observed between the liquid phases was consistent with the model proposed by Stokes et al. (1998). The limits of resolution were determined by sample motion and by beam damage effects; under optimum conditions, resolution of a few tens of nanometers was obtained. This compares favourably with conventional and confocal optical microscopy. In some samples, thin films (solid or liquid) could be observed at the liquid/gas interface. Some of these films were so thin that they did not completely obscure the underlying structure of the bulk sample.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it