MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081858489 · doi:10.1093/jts/flp017

"En commencant par Moise et les prophetes ...": Etudes veterotestamentaires. By GUY COUTURIER.

2009· article· fr· W2081858489 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
H. G. M. Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Theological Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBiblical Studies and Interpretation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Style (visual arts)Subject matterArt historyHistoryArtHumanitiesClassicsArchaeologySociologyLibrary science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Pupil of W. F. Albright at Johns Hopkins University and of R. de Vaux at the École biblique in Jerusalem, Guy Couturier taught for most of the remainder of his career in Montreal. His work was mainly published in French in Canadian journals such as Église et théologie and Sciences religieuses, which are not widely read internationally, and also in a number of volumes of collected essays also largely ignored outside French-speaking circles. It is thus very welcome that 23 of his main articles have here been collected and republished in a uniform and attractive format. The collection is varied in every sense. In length, they span a few pages to one or two that are over 50 pages long. In style, they include material that is obviously survey work for students and lay readers as well as some detailed exegetical studies that will be of help to scholars. In subject matter, they range from an interest in archaeology, epigraphy, and ancient Near Eastern literature through to traditional biblical studies across a wide range of books together with an interest in theology. They are united, however, in demonstrating a wide knowledge of both primary sources and secondary literature, an elegant and extremely clear manner of writing, and a useful habit of summarizing at the end of each essay the chief conclusions to derive from the study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.896

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Theological StudiesSame topicBiblical Studies and InterpretationFrench-language works237,207