MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Free-breathing Motion Compensation Using Template Matching

2007· article· en· W2081893602 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreUniversity Health NetworkSt. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreathingMatching (statistics)Motion (physics)Compensation (psychology)Template matchingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionAnatomyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Modeling tracer kinetics from dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) to understand microvascular characteristics typically requires acquisitions longer than 1 breath-hold. This has limited the application of dMRI in assessment of the upper abdomen. Here we present a template-based motion correction strategy for dMRI of liver metastases based on the correlation coefficient (CC), originally developed for tracking coronary arteries. This postprocessing method allows patient free breathing during sagittal dMRI acquisition and allows a more precise parametric mapping using tracer kinetic models. In a study of 6 subjects, a 64 x 64 template was accurately tracked retrospectively with mean CC = 0.72 +/- 0.07. Mean superior-inferior displacement tracked was 1.82 +/- 1.20 pixels, whereas mean anterior-posterior displacement was 7.72 +/- 4.58 pixels. Application of the CC method significantly improved the global fit (chi2) of a tracer kinetic model throughout tumor regions. Therefore, use of the CC postprocessing method for dMRI scans can improve the precision of dMRI tracer kinetic models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score0.671

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it