MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081916428 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.057

Associations Among Age, Comorbidity and Clinical Outcomes After Radical Cystectomy: Results From the Alberta Urology Institute Radical Cystectomy Database

2008· article· en· W2081916428 on OpenAlexaffabout
Adrian Fairey, Michael Chetner, James B. Metcalfe, Ronald B. Moore, Gerald Todd, Keith Rourke, Don Voaklander, Eric Estey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystectomyMedicineComorbidityUrologyDatabaseGeneral surgeryInternal medicineBladder cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: We determined the associations among age, comorbidity and clinical outcomes after radical cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 314 consecutive patients with primary bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy between January 2000 and December 2006 in Edmonton, Canada. Comorbidity was obtained through a medical record review using the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 instrument. The main clinical outcomes were 90-day mortality, early postoperative complications, and major and minor early postoperative complications. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of clinical outcomes. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality, any early postoperative complications, and major and minor early postoperative complications occurred in 18 (5.7%), 148 (47.1%), 78 (24.8%) and 92 (29.3%) patients, respectively. In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis age was not associated with 90-day mortality or early postoperative complications. In contrast, compared to patients with no or mild comorbidity, multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and surgeon procedure volume showed that severe comorbidity was associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality (OR 6.4, p = 0.03). In addition, compared to patients with no or mild comorbidity, multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, surgeon procedure volume, type of urinary tract reconstruction and American Joint Committee on Cancer stage showed that moderate and severe comorbidity were associated with any early postoperative complications (moderate OR 5.2, p <0.001; severe OR 7.0, p <0.001), major early postoperative complications (moderate OR 11.4, p <0.001; severe OR 15.2, p <0.001) and minor early postoperative complications (moderate OR 2.1, p = 0.019; severe OR 2.2, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing comorbidity was independently associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality and early postoperative complications after radical cystectomy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations93
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207