MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081924364 · doi:10.1159/000132354

Localization and linkage of three polymorphic DNA sequences on human chromosome 20

2008· article· en· W2081924364 on OpenAlexafffund
Paul J. Goodfellow, Alessandra M.V. Duncan, Lindsay A. Farrer, J.J.A. Holden, Ben White, J.R. Kidd, Kenneth K. Kídd, Nancy E. Simpson

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetics and Cell Genetics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicChromosomal and Genetic Variations
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of Manitoba
KeywordsLocus (genetics)BiologyGeneticsGenetic linkageRestriction fragment length polymorphismCentromereHybridization probeGene mappingMolecular biologyChromosomeDNAGenePolymerase chain reaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The D20S6 locus has been sublocalized by in situ hybridization using the pD3H12 probe to human chromosome band 20p12 and the D20S4 locus using the pMS1-27 probe to 20q13.2. A rare new restriction fragment length polymorphism detected in MspI-digested DNA by the pMSI-27 probe is reported. Linkage studies in nine families have shown that the D20S6 locus is linked to D20S5 (formerly mapped to 20p12 by in situ hybridization) with a maximum likelihood estimate of 0.07 for the recombination frequency (lod score = 9.07) and a confidence interval of 0.02 to 0.14. Estimated recombination frequencies were similar in males and females. Using both two- and multipoint analyses, linkage of D20S4 with the D20S5 and D20S6 loci was excluded and the suggested order for the three loci on chromosome 20 is D20S5-D20S6-centromere-D20S4. D20S5 and D20S6 are very useful markers for linkage studies because of their close proximity and reasonably good polymorphic information content values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetics and Cell GeneticsSame topicChromosomal and Genetic VariationsFrench-language works237,207