MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081941277 · doi:10.1117/12.567072

Wide chirp spectrum from FM oscillation fiber laser and its application in pulse generation

2004· article· en· W2081941277 on OpenAlexaff
Shiquan Yang, E. A. Ponomarev, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChirpOpticsChirp spread spectrumLaserModulation (music)Frequency modulationIntensity modulationPhase modulationSingle-mode optical fiberDispersion (optics)Bandwidth (computing)PhysicsMaterials sciencePhase noiseTelecommunicationsAcousticsComputer scienceDirect-sequence spread spectrumSpread spectrum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wide band FM light source is useful for many applications in the areas of communication, spectroscopy and sensing. Chirped light can be generated by modulating the laser output externally with a phase modulator. But the spectrum is usually not wide enough due to the modest modulation depth of available commercial modulator. A more efficient method is to perform phase modulation of light inside the laser cavity, which under certain cavity detuning conditions can perform deeper FM modulation through cavity mode coupling effect. The output spectrum is much wider than that obtained external modulation alone. In this paper, we show the theoretical and experimental result of a 40GHz FM oscillation fiber laser. The detuning frequency and single-pass modulation depth can affect the final spectrum width. The wide spectrum of 1.42THz around 1560nm is obtained in the experiment. By using single mode fiber as dispersion medium only, we can compress the constant intensity light with 1.42THz bandwidth to 821fs pulse. This laser appears to be of great interest for study of high-speed optical communication systems for the impairments and their impacts at wide frequency range. Or, its ultra-wide, chirp output with high sweep rate will be useful for rapid and extremely sensitive interferometric measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207