MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison of Osteoporosis Beliefs among Younger and Older Men

2004· article· en· W2081961470 on OpenAlexaff
Shanthi Johnson, William D. McLeod, Laura E Kennedy

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth and Wellbeing Research
Canadian institutionsAcadia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeriousnessOsteoporosisMedicineGerontologyCohortYoung adultDemographyPhysical therapyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1446 Osteoporosis is a debilitating bone disease associated with a progressive decrease in bone mass, which increases the susceptibility to fragility fractures. It is often considered as a “women's health” issue affecting only older individuals and health promotions programs addressing bone health seldom focus on men. Recent research, however, suggests that men are vulnerable to osteoporosis. PURPOSE: The present study compared the osteoporosis health beliefs among younger, middle-aged and older men. MEASURES: One hundred and fifty men were involved in a study which used a cross-sectional, prospective cohort study design. Background characteristics were assessed using a series of questions. Information regarding osteoporosis related health beliefs was assessed using the Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale (OHBS; Kim et al., 1991). Specifically, perceived susceptibility to osteoporosis, perceived seriousness of the condition, and health motivation to take preventative actions were assessed. RESULTS: The mean ages of the three age groups young adults, middle-aged adults and older adults were 21, 41 and 67, respectively. Participants were predominately (95%) of Caucasian descent. The susceptibility score of OHBS, which measures the perceived likelihood of developing osteoporosis, was significantly lower in the young adults than in the other two age groups (p < 0.01). The perceived seriousness of osteoporosis, measured by the seriousness score, was similar across all age groups as was health motivation or the extent to which healthy behaviours are valued and practiced. The middle-aged group had the highest total OHBS score at 76 and the young adult group had the lowest at 72. Pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference between the total scores of the young adult and the middle-aged groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results showed that the perceived susceptibility was significantly lower for younger men compared to older adults. The results highlight the need for osteoporosis awareness programs targeting different aspects of belief perceptions. Supported by Eastern Kings Memorial Health Foundation and Acadia University Research Fund

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHealth and Wellbeing ResearchFrench-language works237,207