MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2081999777 · doi:10.1029/2007jb004939

Three‐dimensional crustal structure of the Mariana island arc from seismic tomography

2008· article· en· W2081999777 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew J. Calvert, S. L. Klemperer, Narumi Takahashi, Bryan C. Kerr

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCrustSeismologyIsland arcArc (geometry)Igneous rockVolcanic arcSeismic tomographyVolcanoMaficPetrologyGeophysicsSubductionPaleontologyGeometryTectonicsMantle (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A three‐dimensional (3‐D) seismic refraction survey was acquired over the Mariana volcanic arc at 14.5–18.5°N and 145–147°E. First‐arrival traveltimes from this survey and from a separate 2‐D survey acquired approximately perpendicular to the arc have been simultaneously inverted for a 3‐D P wave velocity model using seismic tomography subject to smoothness constraints. The active arc, which initiated only 3–4 Ma ago, has an average crustal thickness of 18 km. Approximately 40 km to the east the inactive remnant of the rifted Eocene arc has an average crustal thickness of 21 km, due primarily to a thicker lower‐crustal layer with velocities of 6.5–7.0 km s−1. Crustal production clearly varies both temporally and spatially, with some crustal layers, including the igneous fore‐arc crust, varying in thickness by a factor of up to 2 along strike. Average P wave velocities within the upper crust of the modern arc are 240–360 m s−1 lower than in the Eocene arc but are 280 m s−1 higher within the lower crust. Middle crust with velocities of 6.0–6.5 km s−1 is best developed beneath the Eocene arc. These results suggest an evolution of arc structure with increasing age: We infer closure of fractures and porosity in the upper crust through hydrothermal circulation and a reduction in the mafic character of the middle to lower crust as a result of intracrustal differentiation. Although tonalitic rocks may predominate in the transition from upper to middle crust, the bulk of the crust is essentially basaltic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research AtmospheresSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207