MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082003916 · doi:10.1139/s04-075

Measurement of growth rate of ammonia oxidizing bacteria in partially submerged rotating biological contactor by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH)

2005· article· en· W2082003916 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Am Jang, Satoshi Okabe, Yoshimasa Watanabe, In S. Kim, Paul L. Bishop

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKorea Science and Engineering FoundationGwangju Institute of Science and Technology
KeywordsRotating biological contactorNitrificationBiofilmBacteriaWastewaterNitrifying bacteriaEnvironmental chemistryIn situBiologyNitrogenChemistryMicrobiologyEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optimization of the nitrification processes in biofilms is important for effective nitrogen removal because nitrification in an aerobic biofilm is considered to be a less than reliable process. Thus, one of the main factors to improve biological nitrogen removal processes is a better understanding of the microbiology and population dynamics of ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in wastewater treatment biofilms. Although the AOB in wastewater treatment have been qualitatively and quantitatively studied, information on their actual populations and activities is still limited. Therefore, the areal cell density of AOB in domestic wastewater biofilms on a partially submerged rotating biological contactor (RBC) was determined by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with a set of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. The growth kinetics of the in situ AOB was also studied. Although low numbers of AOB were found at the deeper layers where oxygen was depleted, they were primarily detected in the upper and middle layers of the biofilm. The maximum specific growth rate (µ b,max ) and half saturation constant (K s ) of AOB in the biofilm were 0.32 d –1 and 1.7 mM/L of NH 4 + , respectively. Key words: ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB), fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), growth rate, rotating biological contactor (RBC).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207