Psychoneurotic symptoms and alexithymia in coeliac disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Depression, psychological problems and the impairment of quality of life are reported to occur in untreated coeliac disease. Alexithymia ("no words for feelings") is associated with various gastrointestinal disorders. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether patients with coeliac disease suffer from psychoneurotic symptoms or alexithymia, and whether a gluten-free diet has an impact on the symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Crown-Crisp Experiential Index (CCEI) and its six subscales were applied to measure neurotic psychopathology, and the 20-item version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and its 3-factor scales to measure alexithymia. The testing was carried out in 20 consecutive adult patients with biopsy-proven coeliac disease before and after one year of treatment on a gluten-free diet. The data were compared with those obtained earlier in non-coeliac Finnish subjects. RESULTS: Somatic anxiety was higher in coeliac disease patients before the introduction of the gluten-free diet than after adhering to the diet. Otherwise, the diet had no significant impact on the CCEI scores. The patients were not suffering from alexithymia, but the TAS-20 score improved significantly during the follow-up. The scores did not differ from those published in the Finnish population. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological problems were not common in adult coeliac disease patients. Gluten-free diet had only a minor influence on the symptoms. Common knowledge about coeliac disease and the readily available gluten-free products may have had an impact on these results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".