Inexpensive and Generic Affinity Purification of Recombinant Proteins Using a Family 2a CBM Fusion Tag
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The selective binding of the family 2a carbohydrate binding module (CBM2a) of xylanase 10A of the soil bacterium Cellulomonas fimi to a variety of cellulosic substrates is shown to provide a new, cost-effective affinity chromatography system for purification of recombinant protein. Genetic linkage of CBM2a to a target protein, in this case protein A from Staphylococcus aureus, results in a fusion protein that binds strongly to the particulate-cellulose resin Avicel PH101 and retains the biological activity of the fusion partner. Affinity purification of protein A-CBM2a from the supernatant of a recombinant E. coli JM101 culture results in a product purity of greater than 95% and a product concentration factor of 34 +/- 3. Measured column parameters are combined with one-dimensional equations governing continuity and intraparticle diffusion to predict product breakthrough curves with good accuracy over the range of realistic operating conditions. Peak spreading within the column is controlled by intraparticle diffusion for CBM2a and by a combination of film mass transfer and intraparticle diffusion for the larger protein A-CBM2a fusion protein.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".