MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082100390 · doi:10.1300/j044v08n01_03

Effects of Root Drying Temperature and Moisture Content on the Levels of Active Ingredients in Echinacea Roots

2001· article· en· W2082100390 on OpenAlexaff
Thomas S. C. Li, Douglas A. Wardle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Herbs Spices & Medicinal Plants · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerbal Medicine Research Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEchinacea (animal)Chlorogenic acidWater contentChemistryTraditional medicineBotanyFood scienceBiologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The effects of drying temperature and final moisture contents on the levels of cichoric acid, echinacoside, chlorogenic acid and polysaccharides in roots of Echinacea purpurea, Echinacea angustifolia, and Echinacea pallida were studied. Increases in drying temperature increased the level of cichoric acid in Echinacea purpurea, and Echinacea pallida. Increases in root moisture increased the level of echinacoside in Echinacea angustifolia, and Echinacea pallida, and increased the level of chlorogenic acid in Echinacea angustifolia. Polysaccharide contents were significantly affected by moisture levels only in Echinacea angustifolia, and Echinacea pallida.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Herbs Spices & Medicinal PlantsSame topicHerbal Medicine Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207