MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082104199 · doi:10.1039/b711869d

The design, synthesis, and characterization of the first cavitand-based de novo hetero-template-assembled synthetic proteins (Hetero-TASPs)

2007· article· en· W2082104199 on OpenAlexaff
Heidi E. K. Huttunen‐Hennelly, John C. Sherman

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganic & Biomolecular Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChemical Synthesis and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCavitandLinkerMonomerPeptideGuanidineHelix (gastropod)AmideCombinatorial chemistryHelix bundleStereochemistryProtein structureSupramolecular chemistryBiochemistryMoleculeOrganic chemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The design, synthesis, and characterization of novel cavitand-based hetero-TASPs, TASPs having different peptide sequences within one bundle, are described. Three families of hetero-TASPs were designed: the LG3/LG2 family (different linker lengths), LG3/AG3 family (altering helix hydrophobicity), and the LG3/LG2C family (anti-parallel caviteins). These first generation hetero-TASPs were found to be alpha-helical, stable towards guanidine hydrochloride, and monomeric in solution. The LG3/LG2 caviteins exhibited primarily native-like properties. The remaining hetero-TASP families were found to exhibit less dispersion and broader signals in the amide regions of their (1)H NMR spectra than their respective reference caviteins. The success in the design of the LG3/LG2 hetero-TASPs suggests that subsequent hetero-TASPs may have potential to manifest superior native-like structure compared with homo-TASPs, and refinement of the linker and peptide sequences may accomplish this goal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.759

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganic & Biomolecular ChemistrySame topicChemical Synthesis and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207