MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082148793 · doi:10.1073/pnas.0807484105

Recombination between inverted <i>loxP</i> sites is cytotoxic for proliferating cells and provides a simple tool for conditional cell ablation

2008· article· en· W2082148793 on OpenAlexafffund
Damien Grégoire, Marie Kmita

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Clinical Research Institute
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCre recombinaseCre-Lox recombinationBiologyGeneticsHomologous recombinationGene targetingTransgeneCell biologyComputational biologyGenetically modified mouseDNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The loxP/Cre recombination system is a widely used tool for mouse functional genomics, in particular for in vivo conditional mutagenesis. Depending on the relative orientation and position of loxP sites, Cre-mediated recombination can result in a variety of targeted genomic rearrangements. It was previously reported that loss of the loxP-carrying chromosome can occur when loxP sites are arranged in inverse orientation. By using a chromosome 2 carrying inverted loxP sites, we found that Cre-mediated recombination not only causes chromosomal loss but also triggers apoptosis. We show that targeted recombination between inverted loxP sites (TRIP) triggers cell death specifically in proliferating Cre-expressing cells, and we provide evidence that TRIP is an efficient tool to ablate proliferating cells within genetically defined cell populations. Furthermore, the procedure requires only a simple, one-step intercross but neither the use of toxins nor the additional step of prodrug injection. With the large repertoire of tissue-specific or inducible Cre-expressing transgenes available, TRIP-mediated cell ablation is valuable to investigate the function of a large variety of cell populations in the context of a whole organism, which includes mechanisms underlying organ development and tissue homeostasis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207