Effect of crowding stress and Escherichia coli K88+ challenge in nursery pigs supplemented with anti-Escherichia coli K88+ probiotics1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Under commercial conditions and during production periods, pigs are generally exposed to a number of stressors that may have direct or indirect influence on their performance and general health. As a result, environmental stressors can influence the productivity as well as the onset and severity of infectious diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of crowding stress on performance and some immunological responses in piglets challenged with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) K88(+) and fed diets containing anti-ETEC probiotic strains derived from E. coli in a 3-wk trial. Ninety-six piglets at 20 ± 1 d of age were randomly assigned to 6 experimental treatments with 3 pigs/pen and 5 replicates/treatment and fed a basal mash diet. To model stress, piglets were housed in 2 kinds of pens: standard floor allowance (SFA; no stress) and half standard floor allowance (HSFA; stressed). The treatments were 1) control pigs with SFA, 2) control pigs with HSFA, 3) pigs with SFA and challenged with ETEC (ESFA), 4) pigs with HSFA and challenged with ETEC (EHSFA), 5) pigs with ESFA and supplemented with a cocktail of E. coli probiotics (PSFA), and 6) pigs with EHSFA and supplemented with a cocktail of E. coli probiotics (PHSFA). After 4 d acclimatization, crowding stress was started on d 5, E. coli probiotics were given daily from d 5, and ETEC challenge was administered on d 8 and 10. Body weight and feed disappearance were determined weekly and severity of diarrhea was characterized daily. Blood samples were collected for biochemistry and inflammatory analysis and pigs were euthanized to obtain digesta for bacterial enumeration. The ADG and ADFI decreased (P < 0.05) in stressed and ETEC-challenged pigs 5 d after ETEC challenge. The ETEC population was higher in both ileal and colon digesta of stressed pigs whereas ETEC-challenged and probiotic-fed pigs had higher fecal consistency scores 96 h and 7 d after ETEC challenge. Stressed pigs had higher (P < 0.001) levels of neutrophils, neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio, albumin:globulin ratio, fibrinogen, total protein:fibrinogen ratio, and cortisol. Generally, the levels of cortisol, interleukin 6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) differed over time among some treatment groups. In conclusion, reduced space allowance stress and ETEC challenge depressed certain aspects of performance and immunological responses and increased E. coli counts; however, probiotics feeding had little positive effects on these measures suggesting further research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".