MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Dual Regulation of Anterograde and Retrograde Transmission by Endocannabinoids

2011· article· en· W2082226143 on OpenAlexafffund
Karl J. Iremonger, J. Brent Kuzmiski, Dinara Baimoukhametova, Jaideep S. Bains

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta Heritage Foundation for Medical ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsPostsynaptic potentialDynorphinMetabotropic glutamate receptorNeuroscienceExcitatory postsynaptic potentialNeurotransmissionRetrograde signalingGlutamate receptorPostsynaptic CurrentChemistryInhibitory postsynaptic potentialSynaptic plasticityActive zoneBiologySynaptic vesicleReceptorOpioid peptideOpioidBiochemistrySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Endocannabinoids (eCBs) are feedback messengers in the nervous system that act at the presynaptic nerve terminal to inhibit transmitter release. Here we report that in brain slices from rat, eCBs are released from vasopressin (VP) neurons in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus following coincident bursts of presynaptic and postsynaptic spiking. eCBs transiently depress glutamate release from excitatory terminals and, in doing so, prevent the synapses from undergoing long-term depression (LTD). Specifically, we show that blockade of CB1 receptors unmasks LTD following coincident presynaptic and postsynaptic activity. This LTD is presynaptic in nature, but requires the release of the opioid peptide dynorphin from the postsynaptic neuron. Dynorphin release and subsequent LTD require the activation of postsynaptic metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). Our findings indicate that eCBs, by transiently depressing glutamate release, limit mGluR activation and indirectly gate release of dynorphin from the postsynaptic neuron. We propose that eCBs, in addition to their well described role in the rapid modulation of transmitter release from the nerve terminal, also regulate the release of other retrograde transmitters and thus encode for multiple temporal windows of synaptic plasticity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience→Same topicCannabis and Cannabinoid Research→French-language works237,207→