Synthesis and Characterization of DNA Containing an<i>N</i><sup>1</sup>-2′-Deoxyinosine-ethyl-<i>N</i><sup>3</sup>-thymidine Interstrand Cross-Link: A Structural Mimic of the Cross-Link Formed by 1,3-Bis-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interstrand cross-links, which are generated by chemotherapeutic treatment with bis-alkylating agents, exert their therapeutic effect by connecting the nucleobases of adjacent DNA strands together and represent some of the most threatening forms of damage suffered by genomic DNA. However, one of the reasons for treatment failure using these agents is due to enhanced repair of this DNA damage. The pursuit of understanding the repair of interstrand cross-links by repair systems has necessitated the synthesis of sufficient quantities of such damaged DNA. We report the synthesis of a site-specific interstrand cross-linked duplex containing an ethylene-bridged N (1)-2'-deoxyinosine- N (3)-thymidine base pair prepared by solution and solid-phase synthesis as a mimic for the lesion formed by the therapeutic agent 1,3-bis-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea using both a phosphoramidite and a bis-phosphoramidite approach. UV thermal denaturation experiments revealed that this cross-linked duplex was stabilized by 52 degrees C relative to the noncross-linked control, and circular dichroism studies indicated little deviation from a B-form structure compared to a duplex that contained a G-C base pair at the same position. Molecular models of the cross-linked duplex that were geometry optimized using the AMBER forcefield also suggest that this lesion induces minimal distortion in B-form DNA. This modified oligonucleotide will be useful for studies related to the investigation of interstrand cross-linked DNA repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".