Unknown Mechanism of Plants Response to Drought: Low Soil Moisture and Osmotic Stresses Induce Severe Decrease in CEC and Increase in Acidity of Barley Roots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Huge amount of papers describe plant response to drought, however information on reaction of plant roots cation exchange capacity and surface acidity on draught conditions is up to date lacking. These parameters are important for amount and ratio of cations uptake by plants. Since other stresses induce changes in roots cation exchange capacity and acidity, we hypothesized that draught does this also. In this paper we checked this hypothesis. Surface charge properties of roots of drought tolerant and draught resistant barley varieties taken from pot (soil draught at water potential pF=3.5) and hydroponic (osmotic stress induced by mannitol) experiments were determined using back-titration method. The stresses were applied at tillering stage. Soil draught and osmotic stress caused even fivefold decrease in cation exchange capacity and up to tenfold increase in acidity of roots of all barley varieties. Surface charge properties of nonstressed roots did not differentiate draught resistant and draught tolerant varieties, however the intensity of roots reaction on the stresses seemed to be higher for draught sensitive plants. This newly presented mechanism of plant reaction on drought indicates that nutrients uptake by plants can be severely limited and relative uptake of polyvalent cations (aluminum or heavy metals) may increase causing additional toxicity. This may serve as additional explanation of plant growth and yield limitation in dry environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".