MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2082322266 · doi:10.5539/mas.v3n4p166

Neural Based pH System in Effluent Treatment Process

2009· article· en· W2082322266 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
B. Meenakhsipriya, K. Saravanan, S. Sathiyavathi

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluentArtificial neural networkComputer scienceIdentifierRobustness (evolution)Sigmoid functionMATLABBackpropagationMean squared errorProcess (computing)Control theory (sociology)SimulationArtificial intelligenceMathematicsEnvironmental scienceControl (management)StatisticsEnvironmental engineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This investigation considers the application of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) techniques to estimate the pH value for effluent treatment process. ANN has the ability to identify the non-linear dynamical systems from the input-output data. An important requirement of the application is robustness of the system against erroneous sensor measurements. The simulation model of the pH system for common effluent treatment plant (CETP) is developed using MATLAB 7.5, GUI tool box. A novel off-line and on-line training scheme for the neural network is developed by error back propagation training algorithm to model the pH system for CETP, accurately. For this purpose, a simple feed forward, back propagation neural network, with only one hidden layer, and sigmoidal activation functions is used. The training of such network is based on Input-Output data which is collected from Perundurai common effluent treatment plant (PCETP). Experimentation and simulation results on this neuro identifier of pH system for common effluent treatment plant are shown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.461

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207