Significant Canadian Earthquakes of the Period 1600-2006
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Raising earthquake awareness is an important goal of seismological research. In this respect, the effect of past local earthquakes is an excellent means to raise the local population's awareness. For this reason, Natural Resources Canada has put numerous photographic examples of impacts of local earthquakes on its Web sites (see, for example, http://www.earthquakescanada.ca). The information the site contains is used in the production of various publications and Web pages and is an important source of information for the public. Another much-used public awareness tool is the Atlas of Canada, formerly on paper but now online, which provides authoritative, current, and accessible geographic information products. The atlas facilitates the integration and analysis of diverse data in order to increase overall knowledge about Canada. One much-consulted component of the Web-based atlas (http://www.atlas.gc.ca) is the natural hazards maps (floods, forest fires, landslides, volcanoes, avalanches, hurricanes, tornadoes, tsunamis, and earthquakes). The information is used by the public as well as by emergency organizations that seek information on the threats faced by their communities. Before 2007, the Atlas of Canada provided very limited information on earthquake activity in Canada. Thirty earthquakes were briefly described in a nonsystematic manner that did not truly reflect the distribution of earthquakes across the territory or the recent advances in descriptions of historical earthquakes. To update the Atlas of Canada pages on earthquakes, the authors decided to create a list that would include up-to-date information on significant earthquakes in Canada. The authors also decided to publish the results and methodology in a Geological Survey of Canada Open File Report (Lamontagne et al. 2007) as a means of properly documenting each earthquake and ensuring peer review by Geological Survey of Canada seismologists. The new list could also update other existing sites including the EarthquakesCanada Web site. This paper details how the …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it