Mechanism of Generation of Volatile Hydrides of Trace Elements by Aqueous Tetrahydroborate(III). Mass Spectrometric Studies on Reaction Products and Intermediates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The mechanism of generation of volatile metal/metalloid hydrides by derivatization with borane complexes is presented. This reaction has been employed for ultratrace element analysis since 1972 and has been the source of much controversy in regard to the reaction mechanism. Here we investigated this derivatization by using As(III), Sb(III), Bi(III), MeAsO(OH)2, and Me2AsO(OH) as model analytes and NaBH4, NaBD4, tert-BuNH2BH3, and Me2NHBH3 as borane reagents. The identification of reaction products and intermediates observed under various reaction conditions was performed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. An alternative reaction model, based on the formation of analyte-borane complex (ABC) intermediates, is able to reconcile all the experimental evidence reported in the literature. In this study, we provide definitive evidence of the ABC hydride generation mechanism, which shows that the generation of volatile hydrides occurs via formation of ABC intermediates between hydroboron species and the analyte substrate followed by the direct transfer of hydrogen from boron to the analyte atom, and fast hydrolysis leading to the final product.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".