MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Potential Effect on the Retinoscopic Reflex of Scleral Expansion Surgery for Presbyopia

2006· article· en· W2082392405 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer J. Hunter, Melanie C. W. Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueOptometry and Vision Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPresbyopiaTilt (camera)Lens (geology)ReflexOpticsHuman eyeRefractive errorOptical powerOphthalmologyPhysicsMedicineMathematicsVisual acuityGeometryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: In this initial study, we model the impact of crystalline lens movement and tilt, which we postulate are a potential consequence of scleral expansion surgery (SES). We demonstrate the possibility that these lead to an improvement in near vision with no concurrent restoration of lens accommodative function. With the implantation of scleral expansion bands (SEB), Schachar predicts an increase in the amplitude of accommodation not observed objectively. We postulate that the SEB implants cause the crystalline lens to be shifted forward and become misaligned. Using mathematical models of the optics of the human eye, we assess the effects of our postulate on the power of the eye, the depth of field, optical aberrations, and the appearance of the horizontal retinoscopic reflex. METHODS: Using anatomically based models of the human eye, the postulated effects of SES are theoretically modeled and optically analyzed in Code V for unintentional lens anterior movement, tilts, and decentrations of up to 1 mm, +/- 3 degrees , and +/- 0.3mm, respectively. The transverse aberrations are calculated before and after SES. Because it has been reported that the appearance of the retinoscopic reflex is consistent with the presence of excess aberrations, we also predict the appearance of the one-dimensional retinoscopic reflex for our models. The change in refractive error is also determined. RESULTS.: Unintentional lens shift, tilt, and decentration, as might occur as a result of SES surgery, would result in an increase in the total power of the eye along with an increase in asymmetric aberrations and little change in symmetric aberrations. The calculated appearances of the retinoscopic reflexes pre- and postsurgery are consistent with observations in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: Scleral expansion surgery could produce an improvement in near vision through an unintentional anterior displacement of the crystalline lens in combination with excess tilts and decentrations rather than as a result of a restoration of lens accommodation. There is a need for measurements and further analysis of the optical and visual properties of SES patients postsurgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.207
Threshold uncertainty score0.293

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.454
Teacher spread0.426 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptometry and Vision ScienceSame topicOphthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesFrench-language works237,207