Measurements of Permeability and Effective in-Plane Gas Diffusivity of Gas Diffusion Media Under Compression
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel experimental setup, based on a diffusion bridge, is proposed to accurately and simultaneously measure the in-plane permeability and effective molecular diffusivity of gas diffusion layers used in PEMFC under compression. The permeability is measuredby introducing nitrogen in one channel, forcing the gas through theporous media, and measuring pressure drop at various flow rates. To measure effective diffusivity, nitrogen and oxygen are introduced in two channels separated by a porous media. The flow rate of the gases are controlled by two mass flow controllers. The absolute pressure of nitrogen in the channel is controlled by a back pressure controller. The ratio of convection and diffusion flux is modified by controlling the pressure difference between the gases using a differential pressure controller, connected to the oxygen channel. The oxygen mole fraction in the nitrogen channel is meaured at various differential pressures. A steady state one dimensional Fick - Darcy model is used to estimate the permeability and effective molecular diffusivity based on the experimental data. Toray 090 samples with 0 and 40%PTFE at four compression levels are studied. The permeability and diffusibility (ratio of effective to bulk diffusivity) are found to be between 0.98×10−11 and 0.13×10−11, and, 0.52 and 0.09 respectivelyand are shown to decrease with compression and PTFE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it